Letter:Sheffield's Parkhill flats failed and should not be listed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Roy Hattersley's article "Time to knock them down" (8 September), raises yet again the whole issue of the criteria for listing modern buildings.
The change in the public and professional response to Victorian architecture in the last 30 years illustrates that if we wait until buildings are (say) 60 or 100 years old, many will have been demolished which shouldn't have. My own town of Bradford is a good example.
The cycle of development is much shorter now and decisions about listing need to be taken when buildings are only 30 or 40 years old. Modern buildings therefore have to be listed and the healthy and open debate which is taking place about it is to be welcomed.
Turning to Sheffield's Parkhill, however. When this was built in the 1950s, it was considered a very forward-looking way of replacing the insanitary Victorian slums. Many young planners and architects visited it and looked in awe at the "streets in the sky". The development certainly went through a short honeymoon period when it was considered to be a success. However, for a whole variety of political and social reasons this did not last long. For most of its life it has been considered a failure both professionally and, more importantly, as a place to live. While the criteria for listing modern buildings should include follies designed as such, it should not include failures.
David Morton
Royal Town Planning Institute
London, W1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments