Letter: Shameful deportation of refugees
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Last week's revelation that 36 asylum-seekers from the former Yugoslavia have been returned to 'safe' third countries presents Britain's response to the Yugoslav crisis in the worst possible light.
Even if none of these people have been returned to situations of danger, the pettiness of these deportations shows a gross insensitivity to the magnitude of the crisis and to our European partners, who have done much more than Britain in offering sanctuary to people escaping from the conflict. Rather than showing willingness to accept our share of the responsibility for assisting refugees, we have shown the same reluctance to help that has characterised our attitude to asylum-seekers from other parts of the world.
Although Britain has relaxed its rules by accepting asylum applications from people who have transited other countries in coming from Yugoslavia and who have family connections here, we nevertheless believe that Britain is violating the agreement it accepted at the 1980 meeting of the UNHCR Executive Committee, namely 'that in the case of large-scale influx, persons seeking asylum should always receive at least temporary refuge'.
We urge the British Government to think again. As host of the coming international conference, Britain will have an opportunity to show positive leadership. We must be ready to respond generously to the new needs for humanitarian aid that will undoubtedly arise with the approach of winter and the need for reconstruction. We must be ready to do our bit, if necessary, in offering refuge to people who cannot, at least in the foreseeable future, return to their home areas.
In the Refugee Council, we have been approached by many people offering their homes and help to refugees from the conflict. They feel let down by the British Government's apparent lack of sympathy. We now need a clear signal that Britain is ready and willing to play its full part in the international humanitarian response to the Yugoslav tragedy.
Yours faithfully,
KEN RITCHIE
Deputy Director
The Refugee Council
London, SW8
17 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments