Letter: Shameful aid cut

Vincent Kingston
Tuesday 03 December 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I am dismayed at the Government's decision to cut overseas aid by 8.4 per cent (pounds 180m) - this on top of a cut of pounds 124m last year.

I wrote recently to my MP pointing out that Britain spends only 0.26 per cent of its GNP on overseas aid, though the UN-recommended figure is 0.71. My letter was passed to the Overseas Development Administration, and in her reply, Baroness Chalker stated: "Your constituent mentioned the target of 0.7 per cent of GNP ... Our position on this remains unchanged. We've agreed to this target but not a timetable for reaching it."

Is it any wonder that we are becoming increasingly disillusioned with politicians.

VINCENT KINGSTON

Oxford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in