Letter: Shakespeare understood Tory values
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.AS A MEMBER of the cast of the recent production of Coriolanus at the RSC I read with particular interest David Lister's article, 'Was Shakespeare a Tory?'
Lord Lawson is quoted as saying 'Shakespeare was a Tory without any doubt', adding that Coriolanus espousing 'the Roman virtues, the Tory virtues' was 'written from Tory point of view'. Lord Lawson is seeing the play only from the point of view of the character of Coriolanus; but that is only half of the equation. At the political centre of the play, there is a conflict between Coriolanus, who embodies aristocracy and authority, and the Tribunes (to pursue the 'Tory' analogy 'the union bosses'), who represent the rights of the people and popular power. They too have a point of view, and it certainly is not Tory. In fact Shakespeare defends and attacks both sides in the struggle.
John Drake
Ealing, London
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments