Letter: Settling NHS negligence claims
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Professor Harris identifies a very important issue. He quite rightly questions whether priority should be given to immediate payment of successful medical negligence claims against NHS trusts, to the detriment of the NHS budget for patient care.
Given the huge amounts of money involved annually in paying out in successful cases, in defending allegations that eventually come to nothing, added together with the money expended by the legal aid board in funding ill- founded actions in medical negligence, surely it is time that ministers thought again about a separately funded "no fault" compensation scheme? Could it be so much more costly?
BARBARA DEVEREAUX
Swanscombe, Kent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments