Letter: Secret tribunal unfair to Serbs

Bill Woolger
Sunday 13 July 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The disturbing secrecy surrounding the UN war crimes tribunal was amply demonstrated when the consequence of a "sealed indictment" was the death of Simo Drljaca at the hands of the SAS.

Whilst the tribunal claims itself necessary because Bosnians, especially Serbs, cannot live together until they have accepted the reality of individuals' responsibility for war crimes, refusals by the tribunal to state that anyone has been cleared after investigation promote the idea that anyone and everyone, especially Serbs, can be presumed guilty.

On top of that, a secret list exists, in the hands of the SAS, who are "trained to respond with extreme aggression" according to your report ("Commando's swoop on Serbs", 11 July), which has already led to one death.

As well as secret investigations and secret indictments, the tribunal also has secret witnesses. If the real interest of the tribunal is justice, why all the cloak-and-dagger arrangements? With its ability to make its own rules and act in secret, the tribunal is unlikely to find widespread support in former Yugoslavia. So what is it for?

BILL WOODGER

London N7

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in