Letter: Scout leaders

Mr A. E. N. Black
Thursday 10 December 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: 'Can you really trust Akela?', asks Sandra Barwick (8 December) in her article about stopping the wrong types of adult working with children. Based on the practical experience of the Scout Movement, which has 115,000 adult leaders and processes about 20,000 appointments each year, we believe you can. In 1987, a professionally conducted opinion survey showed that according to a substantial majority of adults interviewed, the Scout Movement has as its leaders 'people you would trust with your own children'.

This hard-earned expression of confidence has been achieved by the continuing development of procedures which ensure that adults offering to be leaders are checked against local knowledge, publicly reported offences against children and any history of previous scouting service anywhere in the United Kingdom. Next comes an extensive interview, followed by close continuing personal supervision while actually working with children. Our results demonstrate why parents can have confidence.

We continue to be involved with the Home Office on pilot schemes and a proposed code of practice for the vetting of voluntary leaders. These Home Office studies have involved scouting, the police forces and many other youth groups, and they aim to strengthen our existing safeguards.

There is an implication in the article that no effective safeguards exist. Can you relly trust Akela, asks the headline? We have about 1 million parents currently placing considerable trust in Akela and our other leaders, so it appears that they can.

Yours faithfully,

TONY BLACK

Chief Executive Commissioner

The Scout Association

London, SW7

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in