Letter: Scottish approach to human rights
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Before abolishing the right to silence ('Tough line on crime to unify Tories', 2 October), the Government ought to get some legal advice. In Funke v France (1993), interpreting the meaning of 'right to a fair trial' enshrined in Article 6 (1) of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, it was decided that 'anyone 'charged with a criminal offence', within the autonomous meaning of this expression in Article 6, (has the right) to remain silent and not to contribute to incriminate himself'.
Even Regina v Director of Serious Fraud Office Ex parte Smith (1992) is clearly incompatible with Article 6 (1) of the Convention and Funke. The House of Lords held in Smith that the powers of the director of the Serious Fraud Office under Section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 to require a person under investigation to answer questions or otherwise furnish information may be lawfully exercised after that person has been charged with an offence and that such person need not be cautioned, that is to say informed that he is not obliged to answer such questions or provide such information.
In its report, published in July, the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice chose to ignore the European Convention on Human Rights, but the United Kingdom ratified that convention in 1951 and is one of its 25 signatories.
Yours faithfully,
S. N. FROMMEL
Professor of Law
University of Notre Dame
London Law Centre
London, SW7
3 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments