Letter: Scots in Parliament
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In her article 'School history books move into fiction' (13 October), Judith Judd offered examples of factual errors in new national curriculum history textbooks.
She instanced one which said that the Act of Union gave Scots 45 MPs out of 513 in the English parliament, rather than 'in addition to'. She herself got it wrong, though, or else she missed another error.
The 45 Scots MPs entered the new parliament of Great Britain, not the English parliament; vide articles III and XXII of the Treaty of Union.
Yours faithfully, ROBERT SINCLAIR Helensborough, Dunbartonshire 14 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments