Letter: Scornful assault on authors' integrity
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Donald Cameron Watt does your readers a disservice in what purports to be a review of my and Oleg Tsarev's book Deadly Illusions (19 July). His assault on our integrity is so scornful that he neglects even to mention the name of Alexander Orlov, whose career as Stalin's spymaster was the subject of our book.
In his haste to discredit Deadly Illusions, Professor Watt blunders into unhistorical error. For example, he asserts that General Kryuchkov played a part in 'the abortive coup against Yeltsin'. It was Gorbachev who was Soviet president in August 1991. Professor Watt is also wrong in claiming that my co-author was 'expelled from Britain'. He was not.
Most importantly, our book cannot bear 'the imprimatur of a disgraced KGB boss' because General Kryuchkov did no more than authorise the start of my collaboration with Mr Tsarev. Deadly Illusions is an uncensored work that takes account of advice received from a number of scholars of intelligence history, as well as members of the American and British intelligence community. And while Professor Watt may decry selected access to classified documents as anathema to real history, this begs the question of what government does not engage in selective release of its archives.
Finally, may I point out to Professor Watt that ad hominem scorn does not constitute a review.
Yours sincerely,
JOHN COSTELLO
New York City
19 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments