Letter: School tests under the microscope
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I welcome the comments made by Lord Skidelsky in describing the national curriculum testing arrangements as a 'Byzantine monster'. In so doing he totally endorses the concerns that gave rise to the NASUWT ballot.
I also very much welcome that part of your leading article (18 March) that argues for a vastly slimmed down operation of one description or another.
Teachers are torn between two conflicting demands. Workload demands a simple approach. However, professional concerns dictate that a simplistic system used for the Government's main purpose is a virtual impossibility. Pupils' abilities and achievements across a range of subjects are too diverse to allow a simple testing system to have any credibility.
Despite these problems there may be ways forward along the lines you suggest. An essential ingredient for success has to be a vast slimming down.
One thing is certain. The Government will not be able to solve this problem unless it engages in meaningful, deep and continuous dialogue with representatives of classroom teachers who bring a wide spectrum of experience and opinion to bear upon these problems.
Consulting with a handful of carefully selected, if ever-changing personnel, or with education experts who do not have to carry out the work themselves, has clearly proved to be a monumental disaster.
Perhaps the message that is now delivered by a Conservative peer might be more palatable even though the content is the same as the union messenger conveyed.
Yours faithfully,
NIGEL DE GRUCHY
General Secretary
NASUWT
London, WC2
18 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments