Letter: School tests: survey of parents in Scotland, an examiner's view, where teachers' loyalty lies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Today's leading article 'Teachers in a cul-de-sac' is an unfortunate mishmash of unsubstantiated generalisation and provocative untruth. The Government has not accepted teachers' central demand, which was initially for a withdrawal of this summer's Key Stage 3 tests in English. To claim that these (or other) tests will give 'objective information on their children's progress' to parents is nonsense: they will merely show how children respond to flawed and limited tests administrated by (as you acknowledge) a frustrated and hostile workforce.
The promised 'review' will be a hollow exercise if it takes as little account of professional advice as is John Patten's wont. I visit many schools each year as a senior examiner and meet a larger cross-section of teachers, I suspect, than do either you or Mr Patten. It is not 'activists' giving a false picture at Easter conferences; classroom teachers have had their energies and patience exhausted, while senior managers in schools have struggled to make professional advice heard.
Nor let it be forgotten that representatives of parents, whose cause you and Mr Patten supposedly advocate, were dismissed as 'Neanderthal' when they dared to raise their voices in protest a few weeks ago.
No doubt these too were 'activists' and thus unworthy of serious - or even polite - attention.
Your cul-de-sac metaphor, however, may be aptly applied to Mr Patten himself; he should be aware that a simple U-turn will get him out of it.
Yours faithfully,
ANDREW BENNETT
Thoralby, North Yorkshire
12 April
The writer is headteacher of Woodham Comprehensive School, Newton Aycliffe, Co Durham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments