LETTER:Saudi tie
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IAN JACK'S notebook on the deportation of the Saudi opposition leader Mohammed al- Masari was uncharacteristically simplistic ("Who'd tell a Vickers worker he was losing his job over Mr al-Masari?", 7 January). It is true that al-Masari is an Islamist; a claim also made by the medieval autocracy that is the House of Saud. But there are differences between them.
Mr al-Masari stands for an accountable government elected by universal franchise, an end to corruption, the removal of foreign forces from the country, free trade unions, free speech, a free press, freedom of assembly and an independent judiciary.
The Saudi royal dictatorship does not.
Ian Jack underestimates the British working class if he thinks they cannot see that, like Vicker's dependency upon the late Shah of Persia, our economy's dependency on arms in general and the almost bankrupt, highly unstable Saudi regime in particular is pregnant with disaster.
George Galloway MP
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments