LETTER : Santer's views on EU veto
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Geoffrey Martin
Sir: Your article "EU national veto must go, Santer warns Britain" (11 May) contains some inaccuracies which may obscure the debate on the future of UK in the European Union. Nowhere in the document [containing the European Commission's outline proposals to be tabled at next year's intergovernmental conference] or in its presentation to the press corps accredited to Brussels is it stated that the President of the Commission, Jacques Santer, called for the abolition of the national veto. He said that decisions taken by unanimity should remain for essential issues such as financing and certain elements of foreign and security policy, in order to guarantee an efficient decision process.
In the meantime, it is hoped that a comprehensive public debate can begin in Britain as to what it wishes to achieve in its own interests in the 1996 negotiations. The onus is on politicians in Britain to take the lead in this country on these matters.
It would be a pity if anti-European elements were allowed to dominate the debate by falsely alleging, once again, that the Commission is imposing or laying down conditions. Surprisingly for some, perhaps, it is the Commission that is calling for a broadly-based public debate.
Yours faithfully,
GEOFFREY MARTIN
Head of the Representation in the United Kingdom
The European Commission
London, SW1
11 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments