Letter: Safety on ferries
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Support should be lent to Alan Shatter of Fine Gael in his call for a criminal investigation into events leading to the deaths of two children last Wednesday on the Celtic Pride (report, 15 August). This tragedy, especially poignant in the European Year of Safety and Health, cannot simply be left as the regrettable materialisation of what an official at the Irish Marine Department called a 'one-in-a-million chance'.
Alan Murdoch reports (14 August) there is evidence that the vessel operator had been made aware of the problem of sewage gas entering passenger cabins on several occasions. The peril posed by this type of gas cannot be regarded as an unknown or unforeseeable danger. Why did we have to wait for such a disaster to happen before the ship was quickly booked in for design alterations?
Historical developments since the Zeebrugge tragedy indicate that the safety of passengers and crew is not necessarily the paramount, decisive factor in questions of naval architectural design. Today, five years after the capsize of The Herald of Free Enterprise, nine out of ten 'roll-on, roll-off' ferries using UK ports do not fully conform with the original safety recommendations made after the disaster. The cost of refitting is not regarded by companies as urgent, despite the exhortations of some marine safety experts.
Clearly all sea travel entails some risk, but in counterpoising the safety advantages of some proposals with their cost, companies can sometimes make decisions which may prove to be legally classified as criminally reckless.
Yours faithfully,
GARY SLAPPER
Senior Lecturer in Law
Staffordshire University
Stoke-on-Trent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments