Letter: Safety guidelines for apple juice

Dr Andrew Lea
Saturday 13 February 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article 'When secrecy clouds the issue' (11 February) queries the apparent discrepancy between the World Health Organisation (WHO) guideline levels for patulin in apple juice and the reassurances given by myself and others when these levels are exceeded. It is relatively easily explained.

The data we have quoted comes from a 1990 WHO/FAO (the United Nation's Food and Agriculture Organisation) committee report. After reviewing the effect of patulin in a two-year rat study, the committee determined a 'no-effect' level of 0.1mg per kg body weight per day. When this is grossed up for a 70kg adult consuming apple juice containing 50 parts per billion (ppb) of patulin, it is equivalent to 140 litres of juice a day.

To set the guideline limits for human consumption, however, it is a toxicological convention to allow a very large, but arbitrary, safety margin of 100-fold on the animal data. When this is done, the guideline level then becomes 1.4 litres per day of the same juice (at 50 ppb).

It is absolutely proper that such safety margins should be set, and that juice producers should seek to reduce their patulin levels as far as they can.

It is plain scaremongering, however, to suggest that short-term exposure to juices containing levels of patulin above the guidelines will pose any significant risk to human health.

Yours sincerely,

ANDREW LEA

Head of Beverage Research

Reading Scientific Services

The University

Reading,

Berkshire

12 February

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in