Letter: Safer trains
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Dr Arthur Tarrant asks (letter, 7 May) why the "simple system of ATP" (train stops) used on London Underground cannot be used to address the problem of drivers accidentally passing red signals on the mainline railway.
Such systems are used in some locations but are not suitable where speeds are much above 50mph, because of the large stopping distances then involved. The existing Automatic Warning System (AWS) provides similar functionality but can be overriden by the driver. What is needed is something a bit better than train stops or AWS without incurring the massive cost (circa pounds 1,000m) of fitting the network with a full supervision system like ATP.
That "something" is the Train Protection Warning System (TPWS). TPWS has taken us three years and about pounds 6m to date to develop. It provides the same functions as AWS plus a train-stop and a speed-trap which the driver cannot override. The speed-trap allows us to give protection at speeds where the train-stop alone would not.
TPWS is just completing a successful trial on part of the Thameslink fleet and route. With the support and co-operation of the train operating companies and rolling stock owners, network-wide fitments should be possible in five to six years - much faster than would be possible for ATP and at about 15 per cent of the cost. Incidentally, the pounds 850m saved does not become profit. It is capital which can then be invested in other things to improve customer service or address other safety issues.
RODERICK I MUTTRAM
Director, Safety and Standards
Railtrack
London NW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments