Letter: Ruinous addiction to hi-tech arms
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It would be wonderful to think that we could solve this country's social problems by robbing Peter to pay Paul and raiding the defence budget to throw money at social programmes, as Polly Toynbee suggests.
However, a national defence capability that has taken years to develop and would take decades to regenerate must not be thrown away because no party has the courage to raise taxes to pay for the social upkeep of the nation.
There seems to be an assumption that there will never be another war and all purchases of military equipment not designed for peacekeeping are unnecessary.
But what did we see, scant months after the end of the Cold War? A conflict involving the large-scale use of fighter jets, main battle tanks and battle helicopters, the three types of equipment the article ridicules the Government for buying.
CONOR O'NEILL
London SW14
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments