LETTER:Royal divorce: a monarchist's loyalty betrayed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Den Perrin asks (letter, 4 March) why the Prince of Wales is still eligible to become Head of the Church when a mere priest is sacked for adultery.
His question is wrong in one respect. Christ is the Head of the Church. The Queen is, and the Prince will become, merely the Supreme Governor. However the question still calls for an answer. The reason is that a priest is required by his office to "set the Good Shepherd before himself as the example of his calling" whereas the Supreme Governorship is not an office within the Church at all but merely a reminder to the faithful of the duty they owe to their secular rulers.
The Sovereign's sole function is to convene synods, just as it used to be the case that only the Emperor could call general councils. This has the salutary effect of reminding the bishops, the successors of the Apostles, that the ideas that they are servants, not masters, and that the People of God are more than mere pew fodder, are more than pious rhetoric. This is what, it seems to me, they have become within the Vatican.
J A Davis
Bookham, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments