LETTER:Royal divorce: a monarchist's loyalty betrayed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Censorship takes many forms. The latest example can be seen in the case of Ron Davies MP, who seems to have been forced to retract the statement of an honest opinion on a topic of public interest by pressure as much from his own party as from their opponents ("Blair faces backlash over royal apology", 4 March).
De facto censorship is being deployed as part of an electioneering strategy.
Mr Davies, like every other citizen, has every right to voice his opinion and the rest of us the right to hear it.
This kind of attempted censorship depends upon our being persuaded that there are matters we should not discuss and that to do so would be in poor taste, or destructive, or disloyal or, worst of all, harmful to the Party's prospects. The welcome attempt on your part to render respectable and constructive the discussion of constitutional alternatives will fail unless this kind of censorship is resisted.
David Bell
Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments