Letter: Rough justice
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The excuse given by Judge William Crawford for his racist remark ("Mackay rebukes `niggers' judge", 27 March) was that he had not intended to offend. But intent is not the issue. Recklessness or ignorance are equally shocking in a man vested with such great powers. What will the next black defendant before Judge Crawford be thinking?
A great number of criminal offences are convictable upon proof of gross negligence or recklessness, it being unnecessary for the prosecution to prove that the accused intended the results of his conduct. Can defendants at Newcastle Crown Court in future rely upon the "regrettable slip" defence or is that a judicial privilege?
Dr GARY SLAPPER
The Law School
Staffordshire University
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments