Letter: Romanian voting fails to add up
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Jonathan Eyal ('Romania prolongs its nightmare', 14 October) is right to cast doubts about the counting process in the Romanian elections but is, I hope, wrong to suggest that Western observers may have 'bestowed a mantle of respectability on a still deeply flawed electoral process'. As one such observer, my report on the conduct of the parliamentary elections on 27 September shares points raised in his article.
Among my comments was the observation that some returning officers appear to have been prompted by a reflex of the Communist past to 'do what was expected of them' by failing to respect the provisions of the electoral law, in one district going so far as to validate the award to just two of the six presidential candidates of votes which taken together exceeded the total number of registered voters.
Other discrepancies were reported in the Romanian press, supported by affidavits from representatives of various political parties present at the count. In the system of proportional representation adopted in Romania these irregularities may well have played a vital role in taking extremist parties above the 3 per cent threshold of total votes cast necessary for parliamentary seats.
The explanation offered by the Romanian Central Election Bureau for the unusually high number of spoiled ballot papers - that voters were confused by the complexity of the ballot papers - is vitiated by the fact that on this occasion there were far fewer parties on the lists than two years ago. A further cause for concern arises from the exceptionally large proportion of voters (20 per cent in some areas) who were allowed to cast their votes in areas beyond their place of residence. This proportion again exceeds that recorded in the May 1990 elections.
In my view, the sum of these unanswered questions and unrectified anomalies in the count gives any claim that the elections of 27 September were 'reasonably free and fair' a hollow ring.
Yours faithfully,
DENNIS DELETANT
Senior Lecturer in Romanian
Studies
School of Slavonic and
East European Studies
University of London
London, WC1
14 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments