Letter: Road to impoverishment if we abandon Maastricht's Social Chapter
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Sir: It is not an easy matter to refute the superficially effective arguments which you advance against the Social Chapter of the Maastricht treaty in your leading article 'Cost of the Social Chapter' (3 February). There is always a sound economic case against any measures of social protection, as the 19th-century Liberals argued so forcibly.
And it may well be that the Social Chapter is a heavier burden than the economies of the EC countries can carry while remaining competitive. But what is surely beyond dispute is that there must be as level a playing field as possible if the single European market is to operate without intolerable distortion, and that a harmonised standard of social provision must be a feature of that level playing field.
I am sure that you, Sir, would be the first to express your indignation if the French were to poach jobs from us by offering some incoming investor exemption from all social charges.
Yours faithfully,
ANTHONY MEYER
Policy Director
European Movement (UK)
London, SW1
3 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments