Letter: Risks and rewards of nuclear power

Mr Richard Bell
Tuesday 29 June 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article 'A nuclear juggernaut that must be stopped' (29 June) is typical of the sort of short-term view that does no favours to future generations. Currently, only a tiny minority of our planet's population enjoy a reasonable standard of living, and for this proportion to increase we must be able to provide their energy requirements.

Yes, we can perhaps control population growth and learn to be more energy efficient, but the stark truth is that a global increase in living standards will require massive additional demands on our dwindling fuel supplies. This is why, in the long term, our ability to safely manage the recycling of nuclear fuels will become of vital importance.

Thorp, the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant at Sellafield, will lead the world in nuclear recycling and waste management once operational. As with any new technology, we will only learn and improve safety and efficiency through operational experience. Provided this learning is carried out under close supervision (no industry today is so closely monitored) and we, the public, are prepared to balance acceptable risk with the benefits of progress, then future generations will gratefully reap the reward.

Yours faithfully,

RICHARD BELL

Cockermouth, Cumbria

29 June

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in