Letter: Riding the Fort William railway

Peter D. Brown
Friday 31 March 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Peter D. Brown

Sir: Congratulations to Jonathan Glancey on giving the real flavour of the Fort William sleeper "experience" ("A great train robbery", 27 March). This train is not only a vital economic and psychological link between the Western Highlands and the rest of the country, but it is also one of Britain's major, but unsung, tourist assets.

It is also grossly under-exploited, just like the Settle-Carlisle line before it. The Government is trying to condemn the service and silence Tory MPs with subsidy figures which imply that an army of men is working full-time just to maintain this one train. In fact, the withdrawal of the sleeper is unlikely to save the taxpayer a penny. There will be little saving in track costs, as the line itself is to be to retained, and little in rolling stock which will be surplus to requirements and probably scrapped.

If the sleeper were properly marketed and carried seats as well as berths, it could probably break even in a commercial operation (public or private) within a commercially-minded rail system. That means goodwill on both sides, and reasonable track access and coach leasing charges. The Government should now require BR to postpone withdrawal to allow a commercial proposition to be assembled, thus avoiding heavy re-startup costs which would scupper any such scheme.

Yours sincerely,

PETER D. BROWN

London Friends of the

West Highland Line

London, N1

30 March

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in