Letter: Responsibilities of the moralisers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms Andrea Kelmanson
Sir: It may be good political fun to label anyone who attempts to introduce a moral element into politics as a "moraliser", and to turn a microscope on their own personal behaviour, but it has serious implications ("Secret lives of the new moralisers", 1 September). If we give up any attempt to stand by our responsibilities simply because our leaders are less than perfect, where does that leave our families, our communities and society at large?
Luckily, the UK's 23 million volunteers do not appear to be put off by the lack of participation, outside of politics, by the country's political leaders. As John Redwood says in your article, the key is that policy makers should take decisions which help, or do not penalise, those who are making a wider contribution to society. National and local government can provide the conditions in which volunteering and other forms of active citizenship can thrive. The Government's Making a Difference volunteering initiative is a welcome step in the right direction, outlining positive action to overcome obstacles to volunteering by reviewing benefits regulations, supporting volunteering development agencies and targeting excluded groups.
We don't need saints to run the country; just people who recognise the value of individual responsibility and community involvement, and are prepared to carry this through to their policy agenda.
Yours faithfully,
Andrea Kelmanson
Director
Volunteer Centre, UK
London, NW1
1 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments