Letter: Research on violent videos inconclusive

Dr Chris Holligan
Wednesday 13 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Many claims are being made about links between the viewing of video nasties and criminality. In your article 'Censor criticises plan to ban violent videos' (11 April), you cite research done by the Policy Studies Institute into the viewing tastes of a sample of 78 young offenders and controls finding remarkably similar viewing preferences. I would however advise caution before drawing any conclusion about the issue up for debate for at least two reasons:

(i) The criminal group may indeed have similar tastes to controls and still view more video nasties] The use of observational methodologies is essential as a check on the claims made in interviews.

(ii) In an area as sensitive as video viewing habits the possibility of 'social desirability' bias affecting verbal reporting for both groups is a real one. Both samples may have a desire to appear 'normal' and so conceal what they believe to be socially unacceptable viewing preferences. We need to know how those engaged in such research dealt with these methodological matters before accepting their claims as worthy of further reflection, and appropriate action.

Yours faithfully,

CHRISTOPHER HOLLIGAN

Faculty of Education

University of Paisley

Ayr

12 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in