Letter: Reforming lessons from the New Zealand election
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: John Smith may have taken more interest in the New Zealand election results than Mark Lawson presumes. After all, he has offered a referendum to the British people on the way we elect MPs.
There is another way of interpreting what happened. If the New Zealand Labour Party failed to win an outright victory over the National Party, but at the same time the majority wanted electoral reform, perhaps Labour should have caught the mood, understood the disillusion in politicians, anticipated the result and come out for change. Maybe then it would have had its majority.
Electoral reform is not about the Liberal Democrats, Ross Perot or Labour defeatism. It is about changing the political culture, bringing citizens into decision- making between elections, making connections, winning the arguments and instituting the new politics for the new century.
The New Zealand hung parliament, I hope, will stop the free-
market health reforms and creeping privatisation of the education system and state housing. Their referendum has said no to the old Westminster model where, just because a party has a parliamentary majority, it can impose its policies, such as rail privatisation, with the support of less than a third of the electorate.
Labour needs to recognise that there is no legitimacy or morality about this, whoever is in power. It is a good way to win trust.
Yours sincerely,
MARY GEORGHIOU
Labour Campaign for
Electoral Reform
Bristol
8 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments