Letter: Reform of the honours system is a mixed blessing

Mr David Wyatt
Monday 08 March 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Those who would welcome a fairer system of awarding honours, and one that puts more emphasis on merit, should examine carefully what the Prime Minister now proposes ('Major gives public right to nominate people for honours', 5 March).

In a rough and ready way the system of awarding honours to civil servants did indeed reward merit. Those who devoted themselves to the public service more assiduously than their peers were given the greater responsibilities. And with that went an honour in recognition of the meritorious devotion to public service which had carried the honorand up the hierarchy. Some rogues and idlers got what they did not merit; but not many.

What is to happen now? Length of meritorious service and the holding of senior office are not to be the criteria. We are to have merit pure and undefiled. Who then will define merit? No doubt John Major and his colleagues. On what grounds? Zeal in pleasing their masters.

Politicians are busy destroying every centre of authority that they do not control. The erosion of

the independence and incorruptibility of the civil and diplomatic services are part of the same agenda. Cheer if you will, but before long the tumbrils will roll for you.

Yours faithfully,

DAVID WYATT

London, NW1

4 March

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in