Letter: Refocusing Britain's development aid

Mr Tony Worthington,Mp
Tuesday 25 January 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The former High Commissioner of Sierra Leone Derek Partridge was right to point out (letter, 20 January) just how little development money has gone to countries such as Sierra Leone, which the United Nations Development Programme ranked 159 out of 160 on its Human Development Index.

I have just returned from there. The average income is less than a dollar a day. One in four children do not reach their fifth birthday. Illiteracy is 85 per cent. The population is doubling every 27 years and only 4 per cent of women can use modern family planning because of lack of access or cost, although British agencies such as Population Concern are proving there is a huge demand for their services if they are given a chance.

It is a nonsense to say British aid is well targeted. More than 70 per cent is tied to trade. More and more is being diverted from development in Africa to East and Central Europe to help British accountancy firms or other consultants to establish footholds. And more is being steered to the European Union. The fact is that even less development aid goes to Africa every year.

Contrast the scandal over the Pergau dam in Malaysia. I would suggest investigators also look at Indonesia and the large amount of aid that has gone there in the last year, following the sale of Hawk aircraft. Why did both Malcolm Rifkind and Douglas Hurd visit Indonesia at much the same time? How many other cases are there like the Pergau dam?

Yours sincerely,

TONY WORTHINGTON

MP for Clydebank and

Milngavie (Lab)

House of Commons

London, SW1

22 January

The writer is Labour foreign affairs spokesman on Africa.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in