Letter: Rees-Mogg caricature
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As one of his oldest friends, I am appalled by the gross caricature of William Rees-Mogg in your Profile (24 July). I note that all his friends who have so sweepingly criticised him in your article have chosen to remain anonymous, except for Simon Raven, an eccentric novelist.
I knew both William's parents and he never talked about the grandeur of his background. He was, as you say, the son of a Somerset landowner who was married to a charming American and never pretended to be anything else.
When I first met him he was a leader writer on the Financial Times. I found that he and I agreed on most political issues. In particular, we were appalled when Harold Macmillan deliberately misled the Queen into thinking that the Conservative Party wished to have Lord Home as its leader, in 1963, rather than the late R A Butler. It so happens that we were lunching together at the Carlton Club on the day that Lord Home was sent for by the Queen. We knew that Rab Butler and his wife were lunching in the annexe of the club and both of us urged Rab to refuse to serve. If he had, he would undoubtedly have become prime minister.
The most important article that William ever wrote was in the Sunday Times in July 1965, which said that, since the Conservative Party had adopted a process of electing a leader, which I had pioneered, Sir Alec Douglas-Home should resign. Both of us liked and admired Sir Alec, but we did not feel that he was the right man to lead the Conservative Party and it was this article which lead to his resignation.
William was, in my view, the best editor of the Times since the War. I find it odd that you should have criticised so strongly somebody who, for a number of years, until recently, wrote a regular column for your newspaper.
Yours faithfully,
HUMPHREY BERKELEY
London, W4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments