Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Redefinition of
train services
Sir: The privatisation of InterCity rail links is resulting in an interesting redefinition of customer service.
On Wednesday 26 June, passengers between London St Pancras and Sheffield on the Midland Main Line, were subject to a two-hour delay and a resulting journey time of four and a half hours. On this occasion the public address system was not used to inform passengers of any rights they may possess from the privatised company in relation to a Passenger Charter, compensation or redress.
On Thursday 27 June, passengers on the 1630 train from London, through Sheffield to Leeds, were subject to a 20-minute delay until the train was stopped at Derby to allow the 1715 train from St Pancras to Sheffield to pass the now substantially delayed earlier train which was running on reduced power.
As a consequence of this action, the 1630 was 35 minutes late into Sheffield but, presumably, the l715 arrived on time. As a consequence, the privatised company could claim that only one train in this particular period on 27 June had been delayed.
However, the passengers on the 1630 who were treated as second-class citizens were subjected to a much more substantial delay than would otherwise have been the case.
Privatisation may have resulted in free tea and coffee on the Midland Main Line, but it has not resulted in an improved service to passengers who are obviously mere pawns in a pretence of improvement designed to mislead those gullible enough to think that privatisation equals putting the consumers' interests first.
DAVID BLUNKETT
MP for Sheffield Brightside (Lab)
Sheffield
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments