Letter: Reasons for privacy ought to be public
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Prime Minister this week reminded the Leader of the Opposition that he knew perfectly well the number of good reasons why the Committee of Privileges should continue to sit in private.
Perhaps Tony Blair could be encouraged to let us know John Major's reasons, since the latter's explanation has so far consisted of the single word 'precedence', which I take it convinces no one.
Yours faithfully, DEREK PARKER London W14 26 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments