Letter: Reasonable pay for paper-pushers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Paul Barraclough's letter (9 June) is wrong-headed. He makes the mistake of comparing the pay between his one civil servant and three private-sector sons in order to judge what is "reasonable". Whether a job is reasonably paid depends on the nature of the job.
What do Whitehall civil servants do? If his son is, as Mr Barraclough describes him, a "senior" civil servant, he must be earning something between pounds 40,000 and pounds 60,000. This is for a job which (I speak from experience) largely involves sitting at a desk; checking drafts of junior officers' reports, letters and briefing; going to meetings; ploughing through reams of paper; defending policies you may or may not believe in; and, occasionally, having to calm down a bolshy senior colleague or minister. A first-class degree from Oxford, as Mr Barraclough implies, is helpful if all this is to be done efficiently and effectively.
Take nurses, junior hospital doctors, agricultural workers, teachers, miners, sewerage workers and social workers. These are just some people employed in professions which involve a good deal more stress, effort and/or unpleasantness than being a Whitehall civil servant, for a good deal less money. How "reasonable" is that?
SIMON LAWTON SMITH
London SE13
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments