Letter : Rationing health care: politicians should not be afraid to let the people decide

Anna Coote
Saturday 02 November 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Labour's hands will not be tied, as Jack O'Sullivan suggests ("Is the NHS safe under Dr Blair's team?", 30 October), if it refuses to pledge new funds for the National Health Service.

Money cannot solve the current problems of the NHS, which are largely a consequence of the Conservative government's ill-judged efforts to turn it into a giant supermarket. These "reforms" fragmented the service, increased transaction costs, dealt a terrible blow to staff morale and undermined public confidence.

The Institute for Public Policy Research report "New Agenda for Health" shows how much can be done without spending new money. It includes detailed proposals on how to abolish the internal market, how to make strides towards improving health, not just curing illness, how to establish an equitable basis for rationing, how to tackle the democratic deficit and how to position the NHS to take advantage of technological change in the next decade.

We also argue that if more public money were available, it would be better spent on education, jobs, housing and other such measures which really do help to improve the health of the nation as a whole.

ANNA COOTE

Deputy Director, IPPR

London WC2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in