Letter : Rationing health care: politicians should not be afraid to let the people decide
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Since the health service reforms there has been a complete lack of central strategic planning, the philosophy being to allow NHS trusts to battle it out in a market-forces war.
If the public do not want to pay more for their health service, then a severe rationalisation of the number of specialists within hospitals and of hospitals within regions has to take place. But it must be properly managed, otherwise patients suffer and staff become demoralised.
If on the other hand tax-payers do want more spent, rather than seeing hospitals closed down, then the politicians have a responsibility to do this. Of course, cost effectiveness and efficiency must be part of the bargain, and the secrecy that has surrounded both purchasers and providers since the internal market began should be stopped. It should be remembered, however, that overall the NHS still delivers the least expensive quality services amongst the developed nations.
When Jack O'Sullivan suggests we may need fewer doctors, the comparison with the USA is misleading. The UK has 61per cent fewer doctors per 1,000 population than the USA already, so the latter can afford to reduce their doctors by 25per cent and still have more than we have. France, with the same population as ourselves, has twice as many doctors and 65 per cent more beds (OECD Health Data).
PETER M BROWN FRCS
Clinical Director, Head & Neck Specialities
Milton Keynes General NHS Trust
Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments