Letter: Rail arbitration
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As the then General Secretary of the Society of Telecom Executives and trade union officer on the National Consumers Council, I took the government (nominally Post Office/BT) to arbitration 17 times in as many years.
Why not ask Acas (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) to arbitrate on the rail dispute? If the employer refused, the union's case would be strengthened. Of course, both sides must agree to respect the award. Arbitration largely removes the 'political' dimension from public sector pay. There are lessons for Labour: the option of arbitration makes both sides more amenable.
KENNETH GLYNN
Petersham, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments