Letter: Radioactivity at Three Mile Island
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Grant Hole (Letters, 18 June) is both right and wrong. He is correct in saying that radioactive xenon and krypton entered the environment following the Three Mile Island accident, but wrong in implying that the releases were significant.
To say that xenon and krypton are released from nuclear power installations is a truism - it is the amount that matters. One US expert, reporting to a conference in Germany, stated that he received a larger dose on his flight than if he had sat on the site fence throughout the accident.
The Three Mile Island accident was thoroughly examined by the US regulatory authorities including the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the health authorities of the State of Pennsylvania; they concluded that there were no significant public health effects due to the radiological releases.
It is important to note that all of these reports are subject to the Freedom of Information legislation and are a matter of public record.
It is therefore misleading to put Three Mile Island in the same class or context as Chernobyl (or Windscale, itself small compared with Chernobyl) in terms of damage to public health and the environment.
IVOR ROWLANDS Frodsham, Cheshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments