Letter: `Race' is not a social concept
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Ben Carrington (Letters, 19 September) spoils a good case by overstatement. Agreed, Sir Roger Bannister's arguments were fallacious, but "race" (near-synonyms: ethnic group, variety, strain, sub-species) cannot be dismissed as a myth or a wholly social concept.
These concepts have "woolly edges", but do stand for something real: members of the same group tend to have various shared characters which are not found (or are much rarer) in other groups, and some of these differences are genetically influenced. This in no way justifies any kind of racial discrimination or persecution.
Mr Carrington shows a remarkable dogmatism in his argument about which characteristics were most important in determining whether an individual slave did, or did not, survive the rigours of the slave-ships and plantation life. My guess would be that mental and physical features were both important, along with an element of luck. As the future slave-owners valued physical strength above all, physique probably had an influence on who was captured as a slave.
Those who (like myself) have done research on the genetics of plants or animals tend to be wary of those who claim that some human character is due either to genes or to environmental influences (in a broad sense, including culture). The true answer is nearly always a combination of the two.
Yours sincerely,
Alan Cock
Department of Biology
Southampton University
Southampton
19 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments