Letter: Putting a price on human life
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You report that some hospitals are taking calculated decisions to withhold potentially life-saving drugs to older people with heart disease (7 December). According to Professor Grimley Evans, the author of a report on Britain's 50-74 age group, the treatment is refused as it is not cost-effective.
If an individual or corporate body kills by recklessness this is manslaughter. It is even manslaughter when, in a medical context, those engaged in trying to improve or prolong life make terrible mistakes: witness the conviction of the two doctors for killing a man in police custody at Grimsby police station (5 December).
To withhold available treatment from patients, knowing that this will expose them to an obvious and serious risk of death, is arguably reckless. Hospitals and Trusts can, however, deflect any possible prosecution by using economic considerations as excusatory arguments. This reasoning permits human sacrifices to result from so-
called hard economic realities.
Such economic reasoning has not found favour in other areas. If you are caught with a bald tyre (which indirectly threatens life) or no MOT certificate it is not a legal defence to claim you could not afford a new tyre or car repairs.
Yours faithfully,
GARY SLAPPER
Law School
Staffordshire University
Stoke-on-Trent
7 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments