Letter: Put consumers in control of their debts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Even with the combined force of European governments bearing down on it, the Bundesbank is still reluctant to put the interest of Europe before that of Germany. Now the Government must act to allow the British consumer to lift our economy out of the fiscal gutter. But what can they do?
One simple step would be to implement Section 13 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990. This would radically alter the nature of County Court Administration Orders to place the consumer in full control of his debts. Confidence would return as the consumer could again base spending on his current earning ability and expenditure pattern, and the twin fears that many consumers undoubtedly have - soaring interest rates and the unexpected loss of their job - would be greatly reduced.
Currently, a County Court Administration Order consolidates all the debts of an individual and fixes an amount to be paid regularly towards clearing the debts. Section 13 makes four important amendments: 1) it allows the debtor (or a creditor) to apply for an Administration Order without first waiting for a judgment against him; 2) it removes the current pounds 5,000 limit; 3) it allows the debt to be treated as fully paid once the debtor has complied with the Order; 4) it prevents any creditor (with the apparent exception of the gas, electricity and water suppliers) from issuing a bankruptcy petition while the Order is in force. In effect, it allows the individual to retain control of his affairs even if his financial situation has become untenable - without the stigma of bankruptcy.
Implementation of Section 13 would, therefore, protect the consumer from the worst excesses of corporate legal departments. It would promote confidence to spend, which in turn would support the economy and reduce the numbers falling into the mire of unserviceable debt.
Creditors would also benefit. The risk of the client falling victim to a bankruptcy petition from another direction will diminish. Lenders will realise that, in the worst case, they will receive as much as the debtor can afford to repay (which is the most they can ever recover]) and, as an average, more debts will be recovered than under the present system.
How can the Government resist the simple and timely implementation of Section 13?
Yours sincerely,
CHRISTOPHER PAMPLIN
Chorley,
Lancashire
15 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments