Letter: Push back the boundaries of debate on voting reform

P. A. Reynolds
Thursday 04 April 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Andrew Marr, in his piece on electoral systems, omits mention of the variation on the list system called the Additional Member System (AMS), reported to have been favoured by Lord Plant's Labour electoral reform commission.

Under AMS the majority of members are elected as now, first-past-the- post in single-member constituencies. The Additional Members are found by aggregating each party's vote in a small number of regions formed by lumping constituencies together, and selecting additional members from the runners-up in the constituencies to produce a Parliamentary membership roughly reflecting the total party vote in the region.

Some advantages:

1. Complicated to describe, simple to operate: the voter, as now, puts one cross, and when all the votes in the region are in, the computer produces the names of the AMs within minutes.

2. The important member-constituency link is maintained for the majority of members, but in addition there is a regional representation, which should please the Liberal Democrats.

3. Representation is not quite so precisely proportional as under STV, but will get close to it - much more than under the Alternative Vote.

4. Every member will have commanded a substantial number of votes and none will have come off a central list selected by party hacks.

5. In cast-iron Conservative or Labour seats, electors can safely choose to vote for someone who seems to be a particularly good candidate, but is not of their party, but may get elected.

P A Reynolds

(former Vice-Chancellor,

Lancaster University)

Brighton,

East Sussex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in