Letter: Public sector pay

Bill Brett
Sunday 21 September 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The announcement by the Chief Secretary on public sector pay confirms why the Prime Minister was right to forgo his pounds 41,000 plus rise, and your leading article is wrong to criticise him.

Yes, we agree that the Prime Minister and his ministers should be paid the salary increases recommended by the Special Review Body last year, as other public sector employees should have received their due increases also.

However, since the rises recommended by the other Review Bodies last year were significantly reduced by staging, and this was after the Review Bodies had taken public expenditure constraints into consideration, it would have been hypocritical in the extreme for the Prime Minister to have accepted his award since it is the Government which is arguing the case for pay restraint.

Depressing public sector pay may serve as a short-term measure to limit public expenditure but it can never be a public sector pay policy in its own right. Neither is performance pay, which you advocate, since it simply redistributes a limited pot of money, demotivating the many to reward the few - as our members have found to their cost in the Civil Service, where performance pay has been established for 10 years.

BILL BRETT

General Secretary

Institution of Professionals, Managers and Specialists

London SE1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in