Letter: Public must decide how to pay for NHS
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The letter from Dr Brighouse (18 November) about the rationing now widespread in the NHS and the supposed development of a two-tier system to the disadvantage of patients of non-fundholding GPs does not address the true problem.
In common with a large number of neighbouring fundholding practices we have had to instruct our local hospitals to stop all non-urgent admissions. The reason is clear from the following figures, comparing the number of procedures purchased by our practice of 11,000 patients last financial year and in the first six months of this year.
In-patient procedures
Carried out, 1995-96 180
In budget, 1996-67 251
Carried out, April-Sept 1996 141
Day-case procedures
Carried out, 1995-96 342
In budget, 1996-67 401
Carried out, April-Sept 1996 379
The problem is that the drive to efficiency which the internal market aims to achieve has happened. The hospitals can now process more patients than ever before. Unfortunately there is no money available to pay for all this additional work.
There are only two possible solutions: for the Government, any government, to find realistic additional money to allow the hospitals operate at maximum capacity and reduce waiting lists; or for hospitals to temporarily downsize, or even, heaven forbid, reduce the number of hospitals to fit in with required and affordable capacity.
I see no evidence either locally or nationally of a proper costed debate which allows those most affected, the general public, to decide which of these alternative paths they wish to choose and to pay for.
Dr JOHN GRACE
Higham,
Kent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments