Letter: Public control of privatised rail
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Whatever else the 'commercialisation' of Britain's railways may or may not achieve (reports, 23 January), there is a growing consensus that it is unlikely to produce the urgently needed extra capital investment of which public transport has so long been starved. Can I suggest a way of attracting that capital?
The Government should legislate for a system of railway bonds on which interest would be tax-free. These would be issued for or by different parts of the rail network, so that, for instance, commuters on the Fenchurch Street-Southend line could buy bonds whose proceeds would be earmarked for capital improvements on that line.
Similarly, people in the West Midlands could subscribe to a bond issue to build the planned West Midlands Metro, accepted by the Government as a good investment but delayed by budgetary cutbacks.
Bond issues would be open to all purchasers, but would give commuters, residents, businesses and local authorities a chance to 'vote with their cash' for improvements in their localities, as well as giving them a tax-free return of, say, 4 per cent on their investment.
The principle of tax-free investment for prescribed purposes is already well established in, for instance, PEPs, Tessas and business expansion schemes. Rail bonds, if given the margins of return and promotional push afforded past privatisation issues, could scarcely fail to attract a substantial inflow of capital. This could transform both the investment prospects of public transport and morale in a battered and investment-starved sector.
The bond system could work with Mr MacGregor's commercialised railways, provided at least a reversion of the capital assets so funded were reserved to public or publicly accountable bodies. It would arguably command greater public support if the Government simply used the tax-free bait to fund our present system.
Yours sincerely,
TONY ALDOUS
London, SE13
22 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments