Letter: Public control of privatised rail
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your commentary on the Railways Bill (report and leading article, 23 January) omits one aspect of considerable importance to rail users: who will take responsibility for customer complaint, and will the customer enjoy reasonable redress? Current BR regulations are notorious for protecting BR against nearly every eventuality. Will the Bill place proper obligations upon the rail providers in remedying this gross infringement of consumer protection?
I frequently travel on the West Coast InterCity route. The service is generally satisfactory, except for timekeeping. BR has conceded that, due to lack of government investment in signalling and track maintenance, it cannot meet punctuality targets. Complaining has never been effective, but at least there is some small satisfaction in having only one body to complain to.
If, under the Bill, Railtrack keeps the track and a network operator provides the trains, will the operator owe any duty to the customer for punctuality, or will it be able to blame Railtrack for poor track and unreliable signalling? I think this is an important aspect of the debate.
Yours faithfully,
MALCOLM TAYLOR
Lancaster
24 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments