Letter: Provocative philosophy behind animal rights

Heather Evans
Sunday 27 December 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

YOUR FEATURE "Revealed: the nerve centre of animal lib" (20 December) was yet another example of how even quality newspapers will not discuss animal rights issues unless there is some sensational behaviour attached. No wonder certain desperate animal liberationists continue to exasperate us!

Editors have a responsibility to counter these articles with more on outstanding (often Gandhi-style) figures in this movement, a movement which, as your article points out, is seen by some as "the logical next step in social evolution". The most celebrated person to interview is Peter Singer, professor of philosophy and director of the Centre for Human Bioethics at Monash University, Melbourne.

There are also innumerable respected groups in Britain (Compassion in World Farming, RSPCA, The Vegetarian Society, Viva!, Respect for Animals etc) working with immense commitment and discipline, who all deserve your better attention.

Is it not preposterous that a reader should have to write to your columns to introduce and define the word speciesism, any more than sexism, racism or any other "ism"? Why isn't it yet common knowledge?

Heedful of the media's part-responsibility for the animal liberators' desperate actions, you might consider studying the subject of animal rights in earnest (the cool logic of Professor Singer's Animal Liberation would be a good place to start), and then challenging your amazed readers' minds with the current debates in modern philosophy.

HEATHER EVANS

Kenilworth, Warwickshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in