Letter: Profit and loss

Mr Emmanuel K. Stavrianakis
Thursday 02 March 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Emmanuel K. Stavrianakis

Sir: A few questions arise with regard to the ruinous derivatives transactions and the collapse of Barings. If Nick Leeson were "successful" in his dealings, who would have benefited from the enormous profits which would have been made, obviously commensurate with the incalculable risks taken, and, moreover, had these deals been profitable, would a question of "unauthorised" dealings been addressed by the Bank of England?

Yours faithfully,

EMMANUEL K. STAVRIANAKIS

London, W1

28 February

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in