LETTER: Probation Service: change of ethos
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Oliver Westmoreland
Sir: Professor David Ward says in his letter (22 January) about the Probation Service that there is "ample evidence" that the social work approach of probation services has been "effective in reducing reoffending". However, he does not adduce or even mention any specific evidence at all. Only a few days ago, a widely reported survey suggested that the practice of the Probation Service had not been effective in reducing re-offending.
He goes on to talk about the high standard of professional training: probation officers have received at university and expresses his fears that this standard will be eroded if the Home Secretary's proposals are enacted. Surely, the worth and validity of such an institution and its practices can only be measured by their success rate.
The Probation Service has put enormous effort and a fair amount of money into equal opportunities policies, even perhaps in some cases at the expense of more basic areas. This reflects the contemporary ethos of the sociology or psychology graduate. Is there not at least a chance that the introduction of people from different backgrounds of a more "down-to-earth" character might improve the performance of the Probation Service?
Current probation practice tends towards the opinion that offenders are not really "guilty", because they are themselves victims of poverty, racism, deprivation and so on. Worthy as this attitude may be, perhaps it has had its day.
Yours faithfully,
OLIVER WESTMORELAND
London, N2
22 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments