Letter: Privatised care of troubled children is not the answer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I am disappointed that you should print such a one-sided and opinionated piece on Aycliffe Centre for Children ('Legacy of the demon master', 25 August).
Beatrix Campbell glosses over the fact that Aycliffe contains children who have committed and been convicted of very serious crimes, sentenced under Section 53 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933, some effectively to life sentences.
I do not wish to comment on the allocation to Aycliffe of children who have not been convicted of a crime, nor whether it 'works' for them. However, for Section 53 cases, Home Office research published last year has shown that it and other secure children's homes do seem to work, at least better than the only alternative, a young offender institution (prison).
Furthermore, the research was mainly conducted by a woman, so Ms Campbell will not be able to dismiss it on grounds of gender as she has done Dr Hoghughi.
In many institutions the victims of rape co-habit with the perpetrators of rape - in some because they are of the same sex, in others because the offender has been diverted from prosecution by social services.
Yours sincerely,
PETER MARSHALL
London, SW4
25 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments